Comments on: The Evolution of Intelligent Design

By: PB

PB — Wed, 27 May 2009 05:59:20 +0000

While I am occasionally prostrate (alcohol is sometimes involved), my gland is spelled prostate. Otherwise, very funny.

By: Do The Evolution « A View From The West

Do The Evolution « A View From The West — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:29:15 +0000

[...] at 4:29 pm | In Evolution, Science | Here’s an interesting and amusing article about, ahem, The Evolution of Intelligent Design. It provides a useful timeline of key events, embroidered by the odd satirical [...]

By: Jonathan Pullano

Jonathan Pullano — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:08:09 +0000

Paul, you are as brilliant as entertaining as ever. The only thing missing was a picture of three guys wearing skirts! It’s an inside joke, but worth posting.

By: The Life and Times of James Dean › JEFFERSON WAS WRONG! and also I have no original thought

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:31:37 +0000

[...] in public schools, which includes the teaching of evolution and the physics of the Wham-o Frisbee. -Paul Des Ormeaux Dec [...]

By: The Atheist Jew

The Atheist Jew — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:22:51 +0000

Even if aliens initiated life on earth, evolution would still be the only feasible explanation for how aliens became so advanced. Their evolution of course wouldn’t have happened here on this planet.

By: News From Around The Blogosphere 01.20.09 « Skepacabra

News From Around The Blogosphere 01.20.09 « Skepacabra — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:53:31 +0000

[...] A concise history of creationism – It’s very short since it only spans 6000 years. [...]

By: DB

DB — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:50:49 +0000

This is hilariously brilliant, especially the first incomprehensible diatribe.

By: Pharyngula: A quick overview of the history of creationism « Bigmikeh1965’s Weblog

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:41:39 +0000

[...] January 21, 2009 at 00:16 · Filed under Belief and tagged: creationism Pharyngula: A quick overview of the history of creationism It’s very short. It only has to cover 6000 years to describe all of creation. [...]

By: Ben

Ben — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:34:49 +0000

Michael>>If our scientists can do what they are doing, then why should there not be much more advanced scientists in other solar systems? There is a useful working hypothesis,though perhaps it could be called a theory as it offers a prediction,contained in Intelligent Design Message from the Designers.<<

@ Mike

Good, Mike! You’re thinking in terms of hypothesis. That’s a good start. Now, didja ever hear of Occam’s Razor? Good ol’ Occam pointed out that the simplest explanation is usually the right one. See, what you’ve done is just inject another “god” (the “more advanced scientists”) where none is needed. Those “more advanced scientists” can be quite easily explained by evolution thank you very much! We don’t need the artificial injection of a “more advanced scientist” to make our “dumber” scientists. WE make the “more advanced scientist” of the future! Get it?

By: Sten

Sten — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:41:36 +0000

Great analogy, Michael: “A shopping cart that has lost three of its wheels and is going around in circles.” Anyone else think a shopping cart with only one wheel would be hard to move at all? Typical creationist insight. In point of fact, 150 years of scientific research have put the Theory of Evolution on a rock-solid foundation.